论文部分内容阅读
设计作为一门综合性强、实践特征鲜明的应用学科,本应有自身的学科范畴、范式、概念、边界、评价标准。然而,长期以来,业界却一直沿用科学实证主义认识论和方法论从事设计学科研究和评估。实践类学科应当如何根据自身的特点从事实践、研究和教学?默会知识理论为我们开启了另一扇思维之门。本文试图运用默会知识原理比对、分析设计学科中的实践维度,解答困扰我们的一些重要问题。
As a comprehensive and practical application of design disciplines, design should have its own subject areas, paradigms, concepts, boundaries, evaluation criteria. However, for a long time, the industry has been using scientific positivism epistemology and methodology to design discipline research and evaluation. How do practical disciplines engage in practice, research and teaching according to their own characteristics? Tacit knowledge theory opens up another door to our thinking. This article tries to use the principle of tacit knowledge to compare and analyze the practice dimensions in the design disciplines to answer some important questions that plague us.