论文部分内容阅读
2004年10月15日《扬子晚报》头版“名家说”栏发表了“南师大文学院院长何永康教授”(该报特别注明,是否有借名家之名来压一压中学生的“叫苦”之声呢?笔者不敢武断)的文章《“劝学”新说》,作为身在教育最底层的中学普通教师的笔者,读后,很感诧异。再三思之,对其观点实在不敢苟同,总觉得该文虽名以“新说”,却看不出其“新”在何处,总觉得是貌新实旧,了无新意,而且心有杞忧,因为名家之言,往往会造成人们的盲从,或导致思维混乱,认为教育界利用学生的休息时间补课,理所当然,无可非议。如此,积非成是,那也许就不是什么小事一桩了。
On the front page of the “Yangtze Evening News” of the “Yangtze Evening News” on October 15, 2004, “Prof. He Yongkang, Dean of the Southern Normal University’s School of Literature” was published. (The paper specifically stated whether or not there was a name that used the name of the famous master to suppress the middle school students. The author of the article “A New Opinion on Learning to Persuade,” which is the author’s arrogant voice, as an author of the ordinary middle school teacher who is at the bottom of education, feels very surprised after reading it. Thinking again and again, I really do not agree with his views. I always feel that despite the fact that the name of the article is “new”, I cannot see where the “new” is. I always feel that it is new and old, and there is no new idea. There are worries, because the words of famous people often cause people to blindly follow, or lead to confusion, and think that the education sector makes use of students’ rest time to make up classes. Of course, there is nothing to be criticized. In this way, the product is not a good thing, and that may not be a trivial matter.