半亩方塘一鉴开,天光云影共徘徊。问渠那得清如许,为有源头活水来。——宋·朱熹《活水亭观书有感二首·其一》如果说不作为犯是刑法理论中的一座冰山,那么真正的不作为犯只是冰山的一角。19世纪末,卢登(Luden)首次区分了真正的不作为犯与不真正的不作为犯。可时至今日,不真正不作为犯的事物本质(Natur der Sache)仍然晦暗不明。回归思考的原点,不真正不作为犯真的是“不作为犯”吗?其“不真正性”又在何处?~([1])作为一门以 Half a square pond a Kam open, a total of wandering clouds sky. Ask the canal that is clear, for the active living water. - Song Zhu Xi “Living Water Pavilion Viewers feel two first one” If you do not act as prisoners of criminal law is an iceberg, then the real inaction as just the tip of the iceberg. For the first time in the late 19th century, Luden distinguished between true inaction and false improprieties. But from nowadays, Natur der Sache, who is not truly inhuman, remains obscure. Returning to the starting point of thinking, does not really act as a guilty of “inaction”, where is its “infidelity”? [1]