论文部分内容阅读
目的分析对比腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除与开腹全子宫切除的效果。方法 86例接受全子宫切除术患者,随机分为观察组与对照组,各43例。观察组给予腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术,对照组给予开腹全子宫切除术,比较两组治疗效果。结果观察组术中出血量、术后首次排气时间、住院时间均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后并发症发生率比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.52,P=0.0075<0.05)。结论在临床治疗中腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术的应用效果更好,极具推广价值。
Objective To analyze the effect of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy and open hysterectomy. Methods Totally 86 cases received total hysterectomy were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 43 cases in each group. The observation group received laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, while the control group received open hysterectomy. The treatment effect was compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss, the first postoperative exhaust time, hospital stay were better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (χ2 = 10.52, P = 0.0075 <0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy in clinical treatment is more effective and has great promotion value.