最近读到叶黎明老师的文章《真实写作是中学写作教学的出路吗?》(《语文学习》2005.11)。叶老师在文中对李海林老师在“沪港中学语文课程改革研讨会”上所提出的“真实写作”进行质疑:“所谓的‘真实写作’是基于学生自发性表达的写作,只有学生自发、自愿、主动的写,才是真实的写。反之,凡是学生非自愿、非主动的写,都是虚假的写……难道‘真实写作’原来就是这个意思吗?……难道我们今天写作教学改革的主要目标,就是要消灭老师‘虚假’的‘命题’‘训练’‘指导’,消灭‘虚假’的课堂教学,代之以学生‘自发的写作’吗?”质疑之后叶老师认为“判断学生写作是否真实的标准,其实很简单,就是看写作是否表达真情实感”。叶老师的质疑看似很有理由,不是吗?教师进行 Recently, I read Ye Liming’s article “Authentic Writing Is the Way Out for Teaching Writing in Middle Schools?” (Language Learning, 2005.11). In the article, Ms. Ye questioned Li Hailin’s “true writing” put forward in the “Shanghai-Hong Kong Middle School Language Curriculum Reform Seminar”: “The so-called ’real writing’ is based on students’ spontaneous writing. Only students who write spontaneously, voluntarily, and voluntarily are the real writers. Conversely, all students who write involuntarily and non-actively are false writers... Is “real writing” the original meaning of this? The main goal of today’s writing teaching reform is to eliminate the teacher’s ’false’ proposition, ’training’, ’guidance’, eliminate ’false’ classroom teaching, and replace students with ’spontaneous writing’?’ The teacher thinks that “the criterion for judging whether student writing is true is actually very simple. It is to see whether writing expresses true feelings.” Ye’s challenge seems to be very reasoning, is it not? Teachers