论文部分内容阅读
目的对英文版Kaplan博物馆复愈性量表进行中文版修订。方法在对复愈性环境特点进行理论分析和访谈的基础上,进行了问卷的翻译工作,形成初步问卷。在博物馆中发放问卷187份,并对收集到的数据进行初步探索性因素分析,在此基础上做进一步的修订。并对该问卷的信度、效度进行检验;再次发放问卷496份,根据此数据对探索性分析得出的量表模型进行验证性因素分析。结果本问卷共由4个维度组成,总量表的内部一致性系数(Cronbach’sα)为0.919,4个因子的累计贡献率为64.875%,分半信度为0.801,各分量表间相关系数为0.326~0.629,低于总分之间相关,结构效度较好。验证性因素结果表明,最佳拟合模型为4维度模型(CFI=0.947,NFI=0.915,RMSEA=0.055,χ2/df=2.516)。结论本研究修订的博物馆复愈性问卷具有较好的心理测量学特征,能够作为测量博物馆复愈作用的工具。
Objective To revise the Chinese version of the Kaplan Museum Complex Retrospective Scale. Methods Based on the theoretical analysis and interviews with the characteristics of the complex healing environment, the questionnaire was translated to form a preliminary questionnaire. 187 questionnaires were distributed in the museum, and preliminary exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the collected data, on the basis of which further revision was made. And tested the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. 496 questionnaires were issued again, and the confirmatory factor analysis of the scale model based on exploratory analysis was conducted based on this data. Results The questionnaire was composed of four dimensions, the internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach’s α) of the total scale was 0.919, the cumulative contribution rate of four factors was 64.875%, the semi-reliability was 0.801, the correlation coefficient between subscales 0.326 ~ 0.629, lower than the correlation between the total score, structural validity is better. The confirmatory factor results show that the best fit model is a 4-dimensional model (CFI = 0.947, NFI = 0.915, RMSEA = 0.055, χ2 / df = 2.516). Conclusion The revised museum curse questionnaire has better psychometric characteristics and can be used as a tool to measure the recovery of the museum.