一、前言日本在1979年的最高判决首次认可动产让与担保之后,尤其是近十年内,出现了许多令人瞩目的判决,关于集合动产让与担保的诸多法律问题也日渐浮出水面。本文希望就集合动产让与担保相关案例之发展进行概说。在此之前,先看一下关于物的让与担保法的构成。二、让与担保法的构成案例虽然承认让与担保中所有权的转让,但由于担保的限度原因,在一定程度上限制其转让的效力。比如,1982年9月28日的最高判决记载: I. Introduction Japan has witnessed many remarkable judgments since the 1979 Supreme Court’s first accreditation of movable property concessions and guarantees, especially in the recent decade. Many legal issues concerning the transfer and guarantee of movable and movable property have also gradually surfaced. This article hopes to summarize the development of cases related to the transfer and guarantee of movable property. Before doing so, take a look at the constitution of the Assignment and Security Act. Second, the composition of the grant and guarantee law Although the recognition of transfer of ownership in the grant, but due to the guarantee of the reasons, to a certain extent, limit the effectiveness of its transfer. For example, the supreme judgment of September 28, 1982, states: