国家重大历史题材美术创作工程收获了一批作品,同样引起理论界的广泛讨论。本期继续刊发这些论文,其中不乏作者的思考,他们针对已有的创作成果,有褒奖,有批评,有建议,也有遗憾。我们注意到,所有的讨论集中在作品上,而不是集中在工程标准上。这就不禁让我们思索,既然是有计划、有组织的创作工程,那么,其工程标准是什么,是否应按标准检验这批作品,这是急需解决的理论问题,也正是检验理论联系实际的好时机,这一标准的确立是理论界必须完成的任务,也是检验作者历史责任感与历史认识水平的准绳,更是文化产业建设与发展的时代要求。 A series of works have been harvested by the national major historical theme art creation project, which also aroused extensive discussions in theorists. This issue continues to be published in these papers, many of whom are the author’s thinking, they have praise for the creative work, there are criticisms, suggestions, but also regrettable. We noticed that all the discussion focused on the work, not on engineering standards. This can not but allow us to think about it. Since there is a planned and organized creative project, what are its engineering standards and whether the works should be tested according to the standards? This is an urgent theoretical issue to be solved. It is also the relationship between test theory and practice The establishment of this standard is a task must be accomplished in the theoretical circles as well as the yardstick for testing the author’s sense of historical responsibility and historical understanding and the requirements of the times for the construction and development of the cultural industry.