如何理解《专利法》中有关修改超范围的规定一直是业内争论不休的难点问题。在回答审查员对修改超范围的质疑时,专利代理人通常的做法只是试图从原始说明书和权利要求中寻找支持,作简单应对。考虑到国家知识产权局对相关标准的把握日超严格,如果在答辩中仅作简单抗辩,恐怕很难被审查员接受。本文通过解读有关修改超范围的法律条文,从说明书中记载的技术方案的整体分析入手,提出一种消除审查员对修改超范围的质疑的新思路。 How to understand the “patent law” to amend the provisions of the scope of the industry has been endless debate over the difficult issue. In answering the examiner’s challenge of altering the out-of-range, it is common practice for a patent attorney to simply seek to find support from the original specification and claims for a simple response. Taking into account the State Intellectual Property Office to grasp the relevant standards of the day more stringent, if only a simple defense in the defense, I am afraid it is difficult to accept the examiner. By interpreting the legal provisions about the revision of the out-of-scope and starting with the overall analysis of the technical solutions described in the specification, this article proposes a new way to eliminate the examiner’s challenge to the revision of the over-range.