学界在研究盛唐风骨形成过程时,大多直接溯源到建安诗人,未曾注意到由北齐入周隋的卢思道、薛道衡、孙万寿等诗人的创作传统,是初唐诗歌革新派刚健诗风的近源这一中古诗歌史重要环节,诸多研究成果,也都局限于隋代诗坛论述他们的诗歌特色和成就。本文认为,出身北齐、活跃在周隋易代之际,以卢思道、薛道衡等为代表的诗人群体,不仅自觉踵武建安诗人,发抒朝代更迭过程中个人前途的忧虑和志不获骋的悲怨,使他们的作品成为继建安诗歌之后罕见的慷慨多气、风骨凛然之作,而且还对初唐一些革新派诗人的创作活动和革新理论发生了直接或间接的影响。他们的诗作是初盛唐诗人远绍建安诗歌、恢复汉魏风骨的重要津梁,在南北朝向唐代诗歌艺术转型过程中具有相当重要的文学史意义。 When studying the formative process of the Tang Dynasty, most of the scholars directly traced the Jian’an poets and never noticed that the creative traditions of poets such as Lu Si-da, Xue Dao-heng and Sun Wanshou, An important part of the history of ancient Chinese poetry, many of the research results, are also limited to the Sui Dynasty poetic discussion of their poetry characteristics and achievements. This paper argues that the group of poets born in Northern Qi Dynasty and active in the days of the reign of the Zhou Dynasty, the poets groups represented by Lu Sidao and Xue Daoheng not only conscientiously hesitate to Jian’an poets, express their worries and disappointments about their personal future during the dynastic changes , Making their works a rare generosity and style after Jian’an’s poetry. It also directly or indirectly influenced the creative activities and innovation theory of some revolutionary poets in the early Tang Dynasty. Their poems are the early Tang Dynasty poets far Shao Jian’an poetry, an important force to restore the Han Dynasty Wei style, in the North and South Dynasties toward the Tang Dynasty poetry art transformation process has a very important significance of the history of literature.