近年来,史学界对美国“门户开放”政策开展了讨论。有的同志认为美国的“门户开放”政策,在客观上起过抑制或延缓帝国主义对我国的侵略作用。对于这个问题,略谈些个人不成熟的意见。一、为何“抑制或延缓”说不能成立 (一) 关于“门户开放”政策的“抑制或延缓”作用,有的同志认为并不存在,因为这项政策宣布之时距“瓜分”危机最严重的时刻已一年多了,因而后来的政策不可能对先前发生的事情起作 In recent years, historians have discussed the U.S. policy of “open door”. Some comrades think that the “open door” policy of the United States has objectively played a role of restraining or delaying the imperialist aggression on our country. For this issue, talk about some immature personal opinions. First, why “suppression or delay” can not be justified? (1) Regarding the “inhibition or delay” of the “open door” policy, some comrades do not think it exists because the time when the policy was announced was the most serious More than a year has passed, so it is impossible for later policies to work on what happened earlier