论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨氧气雾化吸入与超声雾化吸入在治疗COPD的疗效。方法:随机选择我科100例COPD的住院患者分为治疗组和对照组,两组均常规应用抗炎、解痉、氧疗、止咳等治疗。治疗组用氧气雾化,对照。组用超声雾化治疗,比较两种治疗方法的疗效与患者满意度。结果:使用超声雾化吸入患者50例,出现胸闷、气促、呼吸困难等不适症状治疗中途停止18例;使用氧气雾化吸入患者50例,仅有5例出现轻微呛咳、头晕等不适症状,且均取得较好的疗效。结论:氧气雾化在治疗老年人COPD中疗效优于超声雾化吸入。
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of aerosol inhalation and ultrasonic inhalation in the treatment of COPD. Methods: 100 hospitalized patients with COPD were randomly divided into treatment group and control group. Both groups were given routine anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic, oxygen therapy, and cough-relieving treatments. The treatment group with oxygen atomization, control. Group with ultrasonic atomization treatment, comparing the efficacy of two treatment methods and patient satisfaction. Results: Ultrasound atomization inhalation of 50 patients, there chest tightness, shortness of breath, difficulty breathing and other symptoms stopped midway; 18 patients using oxygen atomization inhalation in 50 patients, only 5 cases of mild cough, dizziness and other symptoms , And achieved better efficacy. Conclusion: Oxygen atomization is superior to ultrasonic nebulization in the treatment of elderly COPD.