论文部分内容阅读
在现行的击剑教科书中,对击剑技术的分类为“进攻技术”、“防守还击技术”和“反攻技术”三大部分。技术分类的方法是可以多样的。但由于各种分类法的要求不同,其意义与应用的范畴也是不同的。象目前的这种分类法,只是从技术动作结构的表面特征来划分的。其意义只能是从形态特征上简明地识别技术动作,应用范畴也只适合于裁判工作和一般性的教学工作。但它对于我们研究击剑技术,以及指导和安排训练工作,弊病很多。我认为,必须从击剑技术动作运用的实质上,把击剑技术划分为两大类:进攻性技术和防御性技术。世界上的任何复杂的事物,或者是由多矛盾体所组成,或者是存在于一个矛盾体的两个方面之中。击剑技术做为一个系统来看,也必然是这样,
In the current fencing textbooks, the classification of fencing technology as “offensive technology”, “defensive backfire technology” and “counter-offensive technology” three parts. The method of technical classification can be varied. However, due to the different requirements of various taxonomies, the scope of their meaning and application is also different. As the current taxonomy is only divided from the surface features of the structure of technical movements. Its significance can only be concisely identified from the morphological characteristics of technical actions, application areas are only suitable for referee work and general teaching. However, it has many drawbacks for us to study fencing techniques and to guide and arrange training. In my opinion, fencing must be divided into two major categories from the point of view of the use of fencing techniques: offensive techniques and defensive techniques. Any complex thing in the world consists of many contradictions or both. Fencing technology as a system of view, it must be the case,