有些同志在分析鲁迅的《论雷峰塔的倒掉》时,认为文章的第一部分(第一自然段)写了未倒的雷峰塔的景色和作者对它的感受;第二部分(第二、三自然段)是叙述雷峰塔的传统和希望它倒掉的心情。而文章写到这里,都只是铺排、准备,真正的议论还没有展开。第三部分(第四自然段到结末)才是议论的开始,写雷峰塔的倒掉和人民畅快的心情。这样的分析,我觉得不仅不符合鲁迅关于写作杂文须从主题需要出发,剪裁极为精心,结构要十分精练、严谨的一贯主张,也不符合文章的实际。事实上,鲁迅在文章开首就扣题议论了,“听说,杭州的雷峰塔倒掉了”,接着,作者虽然没有直接说及对此事的看法,而是笔锋一 Some comrades, in analyzing Lu Xun's “Discard of Leifeng Pagoda,” considered that the first part of the article (the first paragraph of nature) wrote the view of the unparalleled Leifeng Pagoda and the author's feelings about it; the second part Two or three natural paragraphs) is the description of the tradition of Pagoda and hope it drained mood. The article wrote here, are only arranged, ready, the real argument has not yet started. The third part (the fourth paragraph to the end of the end of the knot) is the beginning of discussion, write down the Pagoda and the people carefree mood. Such analysis, I think not only does not meet Lu Xun's writing essay to be from the theme needs, very carefully tailored, the structure should be very concise, rigorous consistent claims, does not meet the actual article. In fact, Lu Xun debated the subject at the beginning of the article. “I heard that the Leifeng Pagoda in Hangzhou was drained.” Then, although the author did not directly address the matter,