QC小组活动成果与科技成果的评价方法应有较大的区别,科技成果评价侧重于“技术含量”,而QC小组活动成果却应侧重于“活动过程”。QC成果不能仅以成果的技术含量和经济效果作为评价的标准,还要根据小组活动的全过程进行综合评价。 QC小组活动的全过程应该是组建小组——选择课题——注册登记——开展活动——取得成果——编写成果报告。不按程序进行,而是先有了“成果”,再组建小组、注册登记,套用QC理论和方法写出成果报告,我们称之为“倒套成果”。倒套成果可分为“变换倒套”和“变相倒套”两类。将已完成的某项工作任务作为成果,以各种方式进行倒 The evaluation methods of the QC team activity results and scientific and technological achievements should be quite different. The evaluation of scientific and technological achievements focuses on the “technical content”, while the results of QC team activities should focus on the “activity process.” The QC results cannot be used as the evaluation criteria only based on the technical content and economic effects of the results, but also based on the overall process of group activities. The whole process of QC team activities should be to form a group - select topics - register - conduct activities - achieve results - prepare results reports. Instead of proceeding according to procedures, we first have “results”, then set up groups, register, apply QC theories and methods to write results reports, and we call them “reverse sets of results”. The inverted set of results can be divided into two types: “change reverse sets” and “disguised reverse sets.” Take a work task that has been completed as a result and pour it in various ways