明清音辨书中常见“假借”这一术语,其涵义和性质与“六书”之假借并不相同,与今人的假借理论也有差异,或指“六书”之假借,或指形体讹误,或指音变构词。本文通过对明代张位《问奇集》和清代毕沅《音同义异辨》二书中“假借”的考察,认为明清时期音辨书中的“假借”不过是一种术语借用,有其特定的涵义。 In the Ming and Qing Dynasties, the term “fake borrowing”, which is commonly used in the sounding of the Ming and Qing dynasties, is different in meaning and nature from the false connotation of the “six books” A guilty consonance, or a fingering corpse, or a phonetic change. This article examines the “fake borrowings” in the two books of “Qi Qi Ji” of the Ming Dynasty and Bi Yuan of Qing Dynasty, and holds that the “fake” in the sounding notes of the Ming and Qing dynasties is nothing but A term borrowed, has its specific meaning.