论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对国际法体系性的特征进行检验,认为国际法整体的体系性具有较大缺陷,虽然其中的非实体性规范与国际法整体具有相对较强的体系性关系,但实体性规范与国际法整体的体系性关系则很弱。WTO规范与非贸易规范之间的关系基本上属于后者,所以无法将非贸易的实体性规范引入WTO加以适用,而且WTO的制定法与争端解决实践也不支持将非贸易的实体性规范引入WTO加以适用。在法律适用中,以体系性原则和工具来协调WTO规范与非贸易规范的冲突是站不住脚的。
This paper examines the systematic features of international law and concludes that there is a big flaw in the systematicness of international law as a whole. Although the non-substantive norms therein have a relatively strong and systematic relationship with international law as a whole, substantive norms and the system of international law as a whole Sexual relationships are weak. The relationship between WTO norms and non-trade norms basically belongs to the latter. Therefore, it is impossible to apply the substantive norms of non-trade to the WTO, nor does it support the introduction of the substantive norms of non-trade into WTO WTO to apply. In the application of law, it is untenable to coordinate the conflict between WTO norms and non-trade norms with systematic principles and tools.