传统的看法认为四库本和荟要本《经典释文》没有版本价值。讨论《经典释文》的论著基本不参考上述两种版本。但是通过比勘发现:一,二者对底本做了大量的校勘,绝不是简单誊录。二,荟要本和四库本有不少差异,荟要本更忠实于底本。三,二者的校勘有较高的参考价值。 The traditional view that the Siku Ben and Hui to the “Classic Interpretation” no version value. The discussion of “classical interpretation” of the basic reference to the above two versions. However, compared with the survey found that: one, both done a lot of collation of the base, by no means simply recorded. Second, there are many differences between this book and the four libraries, the book should be more faithful to the end. Third, both the collation has a higher reference value.