我们习惯上所说的文学评论实际上有两种形态,一种是追踪评论,一种是学术研究。对于追踪评论,评论家往往注重两个方向,一个是热,一个是冷,是在关注读者(或者说是受众)的基础上,审视文本和作者,讲出自己的阅读感受和见解以指导阅读。而学术研究则是从文学史的角度和理论家自身的文学理念出发去审视文本和创作主体,以得出理论家自己的结论。当然,如果能将二者相结合就更好了,本文试图向好的方向努力,来审视评判《桂系演义》。 There are actually two forms of literary criticism that we are accustomed to talking about, one is to follow the comment and the other is to study it in an academic way. For tracking reviews, critics tend to focus on two directions, one is hot, one is cold, is based on the reader (or audience) on the basis of the text and the author review, to express their feelings and opinions of reading to guide the reading . Academic research, on the other hand, starts with the perspective of literary history and the literary concept of theorists to examine the text and the subject of creation, and draws conclusions of theorists themselves. Of course, if we can combine the two even better, this article attempts to work in a good direction to examine and judge the “Gui Series Romance.”