四事实上,文本意义的接受意味着全面地掌握文本中所有的内在联系、文本和作者的必要关联以及文本的具体效果等。不管接受者是否意识到,他所要参与的总是一种互相联系、互为因果的释义学循环。单个的语词符号与作为整体的文本、文本与作者的意旨、文本与其所属类型的文本、文本的个体反应和释义的群体反应等,都是构成释义循环的重要因素。假若我们使这些相互对应的环节获得了相当程度的沟通或流通的行为,那末文本意义的接受也就不可能沦为一种纯属偶然、漫无目的的活动。不过,这里的关键在于,释义循环并不是一种在同一平面上呈现的首尾相接的圆环,因为,如果这样的话,当循环完成时,文本意义的接受就意味着一种完全和本真的意义“顿悟”,也即宣告接受的终结。这对于文学文本的接受来说是十分虚假的。因而,我们必须远离那种设定起点也同时安排了终点的理论困境。在我们看来,循环应该是要求读者正确参与的 In fact, the acceptance of the meaning of the text implies a complete understanding of all the internal connections in the text, the necessary links between the text and the author, and the specific effects of the text. Regardless of whether the recipient is aware, what he wants to participate in is always an interrelated, causal circle of paraphrases. The single sign of the word and the text as a whole, the intent of the text and the author, the text and the text of the genre to which the text belongs, and the group reaction of the individual and the text of the text are all important factors that constitute the cycle of interpretation. If we allow these corresponding links to obtain a considerable degree of communication or circulation, then the acceptance of the meaning of the text can not be reduced to a purely accidental and purposeless activity. The point here, however, is that the circle of paraphrases is not an end-to-end circle in the same plane, because if so, the acceptance of the meaning of the text means a complete and true The meaning of “epiphany”, that is, the end of the declaration of acceptance. This is very false for the acceptance of literary texts. Therefore, we must move away from the kind of starting point and arrange the end of the theoretical dilemma. In our opinion, the cycle should require readers to participate properly