论文部分内容阅读
波兰政治经济学元老泰狄士·科瓦利克一生致力于马克思主义在波兰的传播和实践,并且与米哈尔·卡莱茨基展开合作,力图通过对罗莎·卢森堡《资本积累论》的解读来修正凯恩斯主义的政治经济学,重建由马克思开创的政治经济学传统。科瓦利克认为,不论是斯威齐,还是布哈林,这些理论家对罗莎·卢森堡的《资本积累论》都存在误读和误解。罗莎·卢森堡的资本积累理论试图创造的是一种资本主义的发展理论,因此,从简单再生产的角度来批评她所做的工作是不可取的。科瓦利克的这一观点对卡莱茨基的理论创造产生了很大影响。在卡莱茨基晚年论文《论资本主义的关键改革》中,他们合作把凯恩斯革命放在围绕资本主义再生产辩论的背景下进行考察。这是对罗莎·卢森堡资本积累理论进行当代阐释的一种尝试。
Tateishi Kovalike, a veteran of political economy in Poland, devoted his life to the spread and practice of Marxism in Poland. He also cooperated with Mikhal Karezki in an attempt to analyze the “capital accumulation theory” of Rosa Luxemburg Interpretation to correct Keynesian political economy, to rebuild the tradition of political economy pioneered by Marx. Kovalik argues that these theorists, irrespective of Swatch and Bukharin, misread and misunderstood Rosa Luxemburg’s theory of “capital accumulation.” Rosa Luxemburg’s theory of capital accumulation is trying to create a theory of capitalist development. Therefore, it is not advisable to criticize what she did from a simple reproduction perspective. Kovalik’s view of this has a great impact on the creation of Kareziki’s theory. In his later book The Critical Reform of Capitalism, Kalezky’s work collaborated to examine the Keynesian revolution in the context of the debate on the reproduction of capitalism. This is an attempt to contemporaryize Rosa Luxemburg’s theory of capital accumulation.