论文部分内容阅读
近日,网友掀起各地机场调侃商品冠名潮,“舌尖上的机场”迅速窜起。一些专家更是认为,宜宾机场更名违反《民用机场使用许可规定》的规定和惯例,并认为五粮液冠名机场有公器私用之嫌。对于宜宾机场更名宜宾五粮液机场一事,宜宾市政府的回应称,以五粮液命名,既能提高宜宾市的知名度,还能扩大五粮液的影响力,是一个双赢的合作。高分贝的声音并不代表有理,站得住脚的、具有说服力的观点需要合法合理的论据支持,笔者认为,无论是从合法性,还是合理性角度来看,“四川宜宾五粮液机场”均无不可。根据《民法通则》第37条规定,法人
Recently, netizens set off tide around the airport ridicule products, “tongue on the airport ” quickly sprang up. Some experts even think that the change of name of Yibin Airport violates the provisions of “Regulations on the Use of Civilian Airports and the Provisions” and holds that Wuliangye Airport is suspected of being used by public for private use. For Yibin Airport renamed Yibin Wuliangye Airport, Yibin City Government responded that the name of Wuliangye, not only improve the visibility of Yibin City, but also to expand the influence of Wuliangye is a win-win cooperation. High-decibel sound does not represent a reasonable, sustainable, persuasive point of view requires a legitimate and reasonable argument support, I believe that, whether from the legitimacy or reasonable point of view, “Sichuan Yibin Wuliangye Airport ”No no no. According to Article 37 of the General Principles of Civil Law, legal persons