论文部分内容阅读
在比较法的视野下考察发现,两大法系在法典化问题上呈现出互相借鉴、吸收和融合的趋势。首先,在英美法系国家,制定法的数量快速增长,日益成为一种重要的法律渊源。其次,在大陆法系国家,一方面是判例法已越来越普遍地被认可为一种法律渊源;另一方面,在传统的基本法典之外,出现了大量的单行法规,呈现出所谓的解法典化趋势。当然,两大法系的差异仍然显著地存在,比如英美法系的制定法更多的是一种法律汇篇,而不是大陆法系结构严谨的法典编纂。
The investigation under the comparative law found that the two legal systems showed a tendency of mutual reference, absorption and integration on the issue of codification. First, in Anglo-American legal systems, the rapid growth in statutory law is increasingly becoming an important legal source. Second, in civil law countries, on the one hand, case law has been increasingly recognized as a source of law; on the other hand, there have been a large number of unilateral laws and regulations out of the traditional basic code, showing the so-called solution Codification trend. Of course, the differences between the two major legal systems still exist. For example, the law of the Anglo-American legal system is more of a legal system, not a rigorous codification of the legal system of the civil law system.