论文部分内容阅读
本文试图通过对沃尔什著作中专题讨论“历史学的解释”着手,从思路上分析和梳理沃尔什对于“解释”概念的理解。沃尔什的讨论从历史学的载体文本出发,表明历史学是叙述性的,由事件、行为和历史因果性三者组成了历史解释的主要部分,在依次分析后发现历史学解释本身是方法论问题;对这种方法论问题的深入研究,得出这种方法论的存在性依据和合法基础在于历史学的知识形式,以及历史学如何区别于其他科学。要清楚地讨论历史学的解释问题,必须正面研究历史学的前提假设和不同理论系统的共同基础。
This article attempts to analyze and sort out Walsh’s understanding of the concept of “explanation ” from the point of view of the thematic discussion in Walsh’s book “the explanation of history ”. Walsh’s discussion starts from the carrier’s text of history and shows that history is narrative, and the main part of historical explanation is composed of events, behaviors and historical causality. After analyzing in turn, it is found that historical interpretation itself is methodological Problems; this in-depth study of the methodology, come to the existence of this method is based on the legal basis and the historical knowledge of the form, as well as how the history of science is different from other sciences. To clearly discuss the interpretation of history, we must positively study the preconditions of history and the common ground of different theoretical systems.