论文部分内容阅读
法教义学与社科法学对法律现象的不同研究范式与思路,反映出两大学术阵营与中国社会法律实践需求的紧密关系。法教义学的发展源于改革开放后中国法制建设过程中法律应用的迫切需要,并以此来保障法律的正确实施;而社科法学的兴起,则是对法教义学专注规范分析与制度建构过程中,忽视与其他社会系统间的相互影响,所给社会带来的日趋增长的成本压力的一种反思,从而告诫人们应以更加谨慎的态度去看待法律对于现实生活的介入。法教义学与社科法学在各自领域内的发展壮大,对中国法学以及其他社会学科的发展均有所贡献,但两大学术阵营在“交锋”的过程中,也不同程度上出现了一些问题。彼此间的对立与批判,并非是提升各方学术水平、影响力的有效措施,或许,更为贴近现实生活、更能有效针对法律实践需求而不断完善、发展的法学理论,方能在中国法学发展的进程中更胜一筹。
The different paradigms and ideas of law teaching and social science legal law on legal phenomena reflect the close relationship between the two academic camps and the needs of Chinese society in legal practice. The development of legal doctrine stems from the urgent need of legal application in the process of legal construction in China after the reform and opening up and in order to ensure the correct implementation of the law. The rise of social jurisprudence is the focus on normative analysis and institutional construction Process, ignoring the interaction with other social systems, giving the society a growing reflection of cost pressures, which warned people should be more cautious attitude to the law for real-life intervention. Both legal doctrine and social science jurisprudence have grown in their respective fields and contributed to the development of Chinese law and other social disciplines. However, in the course of “confrontation ”, the two major academic camps also appeared in varying degrees some problems. Opposition and criticism between each other is not an effective measure to enhance the academic level and influence of all parties. Perhaps, the legal theory that is closer to the real life and can be more perfect and developed continuously in accordance with the needs of legal practice can not be used in China law The development process better.