第一种是“跟风”。今天经济开发区热,一些经济学家就大力论证经济开发区如何重要,如何可行;明天国际金融中心热,一些经济学家又一轰而起,积极倡导中国应建立多少个国际金融中心。至于建立这些开发区和国际金融中心实际有无必要,是否真正可行,则不在这些经济学家的考虑之中。第二种是“放炮”。在一些热点问题的探讨中,有的经济学家经常喜欢将问题简单化、通俗化,找出几个肤浅的主要次要原因,针对几个有关部门轰上几炮,至于这些原因是否是真正的原因,有关部门应如何切实可行地解决,他们并不关心。第三种是“建议热”。对经济改革中出现的各种问题,有些经济学家们的建议层出 The first is “follow suit.” Today, the economic development zone is hot. Some economists have vigorously demonstrated how important the economic development zone is and how feasible it is. As the international financial center is hot tomorrow, some economists have been sparring with each other and actively advocating how many international financial centers China should establish. Whether or not the establishment of these zones and international financial centers is actually necessary is beyond the considerations of these economists. The second is “blasting.” In discussing some hot issues, some economists often like to simplify and popularize the issue and find out a few primary causes of superficiality. In view of how many guns are blown off by several relevant departments, whether these reasons are true The reason why the relevant departments should be practical and feasible solution, they do not care. The third is “recommended heat.” Some economists’ suggestions have been put forward on the various problems that have emerged in the economic reform