思想政治工作被大多数人认为是弹性工作,可松可紧、可深可浅。产生这种思想认识的根源除了主观原因外,就是没有全面科学地建立起思想政治工作的质量评价体系,无法对松与紧、深与浅进行真实可靠的测评。多年来,这种评价体系一直是思想政治工作者研究的重要课题,因为评价体系对于工作方向具有导向性,使工作向评价体系要求的方向前进。评价体系具有可度量性,能判别工作的好与坏、力度的大与小、效果的优与劣,同时具有约束性和激励性。哪些该做,哪些不能做,做好了会怎么样,做错了要怎么样,这些在评价中都应规定。评价体系的建立和完善能够从客观上消除思想政治工作可有可无的错误认识,只有这样,这一手也才能够真正 Most people think that ideological and political work is flexible work, which can be loose and tight, but can be shallow and shallow. In addition to the subjective reasons for producing this kind of ideological understanding, there is no comprehensive and scientific establishment of a quality evaluation system for ideological and political work, so that real and reliable assessments of looseness, tightness, and depth can not be made. Over the years, this system of evaluation has always been an important issue for the study of ideological and political workers because the evaluation system is oriented towards the work direction and advances the work toward the requirements of the evaluation system. Evaluation system is measurable, can determine the work of good and bad, the intensity of large and small, the effect of superior and inferior, at the same time binding and motivational. Which should be done, what can not be done, what will happen when done well, what should be done wrongly, and these should be stipulated in the evaluation. The establishment and improvement of the evaluation system can objectively eliminate the indispensable misunderstanding of ideological and political work, and only in this way can this hand be real