论文部分内容阅读
普遍观点认为,已经安装在建筑物上的电梯系建筑物的构成部分,其权属应以其附着的建筑物权属为准。由于电梯是一种可拆卸的特种设备,其所有权可与使用、营运、维修、保养、更换等权属相分离,所以,电梯的权属并不必然与其附着的建筑物权属相同。那么,对在执行拍卖建筑物过程中产生的电梯权属异议,司法部门应把握何种审查认定原则?
It is generally accepted that the components of an elevator system already installed on a building shall be subject to the ownership of the building to which they are attached. Since the elevator is a detachable special equipment whose ownership can be separated from ownership of ownership, operation, maintenance, maintenance and replacement, the ownership of the elevator does not necessarily have to be the same as the ownership of the building to which it is attached. So, objection to the elevator in the implementation of the auction building process, the judiciary should grasp what kind of review found that the principle?