论文部分内容阅读
目的探究不同采血方法在血常规检验中的临床应用价值。方法选取我院2015年7月至2016年5月100例接受血常规检验的患者,随机分为对照组与实验组,每组50例,对照组采用末梢血采集法,实验组采用静脉血采集法,观察两组不同采血方法的效果。结果实验组患者血常规检验中的RBC、WBC、PLT、h B、h CT检测结果均明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。另外,两组患者血常规检验中MCh C检测结果无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论与末梢血采集法相比,在血常规检验中采用静脉血采集法效果更好,检测结果更加准确,具有较好的临床应用价值。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of different blood sampling methods in blood tests. Methods A total of 100 patients who underwent routine blood tests from July 2015 to May 2016 in our hospital were randomly divided into control group and experimental group with 50 cases in each group. The control group received peripheral blood collection and the experimental group received intravenous blood collection Method to observe the effect of two different blood sampling methods. Results The results of RBC, WBC, PLT, h B and h CT in the blood test of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the control group (P <0.05). In addition, the two groups of patients with blood test MCh C test results no significant difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the peripheral blood collection method, the venous blood collection method in the blood test is better, the test results are more accurate, and has better clinical value.