一、问题的提出近年来,合义务替代履行是理论界热烈讨论的问题,该争论的内容在于结果回避可能性存疑时,究竟以怎样的方式加以解决。对于该问题,目前有两种解决路径:其一,风险增高理论。只要能够确定行为人对注意义务的违反与被容许的危险相比,升高了法益侵害结果发生的可能性,就足以肯定义务违反与结果之间的关联。即只要根据事后查明的所有客观事实能够认定合义务替代行为具有防止结果发生的可能,就说明义务违反行为增加了结果发生的风险,进而即可归责。其二,罪疑惟轻。只有当合 First, the issue raised In recent years, the obligation to replace the performance of theorists in the field of heated discussions, the content of the controversy is the possibility of dodging doubt, what is the way to be resolved. There are two solutions to this problem: First, the theory of risk increase. As long as it can be ascertained that the perpetrator’s violation of the duty of care and the permissible danger raise the likelihood of the result of the violation of law and interests, it is enough to affirm the link between obligation violation and result. That is, as long as all the objective facts ascertained afterwards can identify the possibility of substituting for compulsory substitution to prevent the occurrence of the result, it means that the obligation breach increases the risk of the result and becomes imputable. Second, the only suspicion of light. Only when together