论文部分内容阅读
５０年代上半期，我国朝鲜族取消了夹用汉字，只用朝鲜文。这一举措在当时历史条件下，提高了全民族文化水平，取得了明显效果。４０余年专用朝鲜文的实践表明废除汉字有得有失，弊大于利。根据近年来延边教改办公室采用夹用汉字的教材所进行的实验，考虑到社会上不同文化层次的需要，我国朝鲜族文字体制似不应采取“一刀切”的办法。作为社会上通用的文字，可以专用朝鲜文，但各级民族学校的朝鲜语文课则有必要进行汉字教育，各学科的教材也应采用一定数量的夹用汉字的朝汉混合体文。
In the first half of the 1950s, Chinese Koreans canceled the use of Chinese characters and used only Korean. Under the historical conditions of that time, this measure raised the overall national cultural level and achieved remarkable results. More than 40 years of dedicated Korean practice shows that the abolition of Chinese characters has advantages and disadvantages, more harm than good. According to the experiment carried out in Yanbian Education Reform Office in recent years by using textbooks with Chinese characters, taking into account the needs of different cultural levels in society, it is unlikely that the system of Chinese writing in Korean should adopt a “one-size-fits-all” approach. As a common language in the society, Korean language can be used exclusively. However, it is necessary to carry out Chinese education in Korean language courses at all levels of ethnic schools, and a certain number of Chinese-Korean mixture of Chinese and Chinese characters should be adopted in all subjects.