请下载后查看，本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。近年国内理论界对西方女权主义文学批评的评介空前活跃,但引进的多是女权批评第一阶段与第二阶段的成果,即主要是对文学社会学女权主义批评的介绍,且多是女权主义批评家的论著。相比之下,对于符号学、阐释学、读者反应批评等批评流派所呈现的性别价值倚重,以及非女权主义者如何进行文学中的性别视角观照等问题,则少见可资借鉴的材料。即使有一点对于法国符号学女权批评家朱丽叶·克丽丝蒂娃的评 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile. In recent years, domestic theorists have been more active in the critique of western feminist literary criticism, but most of the achievements introduced in the first and second stages of feminist criticism are mainly the introduction of feminist criticism in literary sociology and mostly feminism Critics’ writings. In contrast, there are few materials that can be borrowed from such questions as the gender value presented by critical schools such as semiotics, hermeneutics and reader’s reaction criticism, and how non-feminists carry on the gender perspective in literature. Even a little comment on the French semiotic criticism of women’s rights Juliette Christie baby