论文部分内容阅读
入世后我国区域知识产权保护制度总体滞后,特别是缺乏抢占国际前沿意识,争创国际名牌意识,缺乏有效的统筹与规划。南京市的知识产权保护制度与TRIPS协定有相容之处,也有不相容之处,在对其分析的基础上,对我国区域知识产权保护的政策与制度、技术人员与出口产品,以及“适世”的开拓创新等问题提出了看法。
After China’s accession to the WTO, the system of regional intellectual property protection in our country lags behind. In particular, it lacks the preemptive awareness of international frontiers and strives to create awareness of international brand names. It lacks effective co-ordination and planning. Nanjing’s intellectual property protection system and the TRIPS agreement are compatible with, but also incompatible with, on the basis of its analysis of China’s regional intellectual property protection policies and systems, technical personnel and export products, as well as “ Appropriate ”for pioneering and innovative issues raised.