论文部分内容阅读
发生在一九二八年的关于《诗经·伯兮》“粗人”的争论,时间虽短,但是影响较大,多位学者参与进来,多家刊物登载争论文章。不过,考之史料,这场争论从开始就偏离了学术轨道,青年学者以学术为“攻”器,发展到后来则直接进行人身攻击,实在是近代《诗》学史上一场无聊之争。不过,今天看来,这次辩论倒给《诗》学研究以诸多借鉴:《诗》学研究应该回到《诗经》时代;细枝末节的纠缠无异于学术健康发展;既要尊重前辈的研究成果,也要重视年轻学者的创新精神。
The controversy over the Book of Songs, the poem, and the rough people, which took place in 1928, was short-lived, but it was more influential. Many scholars came in and many journals published articles on the controversy. However, the test of historical data, the controversy deviated from the academic track from the beginning, young scholars to academic as “attack ” device, developed directly to the subsequent personal attacks, it is the modern history of “poetry” a boring Fight However, today it seems that this debate has brought many lessons to the study of “poetry”: the study of “poetry” should return to the era of “the Book of Songs”; the entanglement of minutiae is no different from the academic healthy development; it is necessary to respect the achievements of predecessors , But also attach importance to the innovative spirit of young scholars.