论文部分内容阅读
中国高校智库在跨越式发展过程中,出现了定位争议和问题意识模糊的问题,根源在于科学研究和政策实务相对立的传统观念。为此,中央设立了“国家高端智库”试点,从一系列文件中可以分析出决策层的考量与需求。而通过将“社会工程”与“社会科学”相区分,智库的一套选题框架可以展示其独特的问题意识。最后,“知行合一”的智库观念革新,既能引导学术研究产出更多可践行的思想,又克服了传统对策建议的短视。中国特色高校智库的未来走向,是扬弃美国政党政治下的智库模式,在思想市场上承担更多公共职责。
In the process of leapfrog development, think tanks in Chinese colleges and universities have faced the issue of positioning controversy and vague awareness of problems, due to the traditional concept that scientific research and policy practice are opposed. To this end, the central government has set up a pilot project entitled “National High-end Think Tank”, which can analyze the considerations and needs of decision-makers from a series of documents. By differentiating between “social engineering” and “social sciences,” a set of frameworks for think tanks can showcase their unique problem awareness. Finally, the concept of “think-and-go-one” think tank innovation can not only lead academic research to produce more practical ideas, but also overcome shortcomings of traditional countermeasures and suggestions. The future trend of think tanks of Chinese characteristics is to abandon the think tank model under the political party of the United States and to assume more public responsibilities in the ideological market.