在学习中国古代民族关系问题时,很多同学对古代边疆行政管辖问题产生错误理解。如在学习“隋唐统一多民族国家的发展”这一内容时认为:唐玄宗册封南诏首领皮罗阁为云南王,南诏与唐朝形成附属关系,因此说明唐朝对云南地区进行了直接行政管辖。其实这种观点是错误的。那么如何确? When studying the issue of ethnic relations in ancient China, many students misunderstood the issue of administrative jurisdiction in the ancient border areas. For example, when studying the content of the “development of a unified multi-ethnic country in the Sui and Tang dynasties,” it was held that: Tang Xuanzong sealed the Nanxun leader Pi Luoge as the king of Yunnan, and Nanzhao formed an affiliation with the Tang Dynasty, thus indicating that the Tang Dynasty had carried out the Yunnan region. Direct administrative jurisdiction. Actually this kind of view is wrong. How is it?