赵元任先生曾指出:“只能修饰名词,不能做谓语的形容词,严格地说,没有”。这个观点代表了早一些时候汉语语法学界对于形容词的普遍认识。近年来的“非谓形容词”一说,引起了语法学界对形容词的重新认识。现在,几乎在所有涉及形容词的语法论述中,都接受了“非谓形容词”这个范畴。不过,笔者通过一些观察和分析,觉得提出“非谓形容词”这一范畴的立论和取证,尚有不少疑点,所以在此不揣浅陋,提出一些肤浅的见解,就教于语法学界的前辈和同行。1.根据汉语语法研究中普遍接受的观点,划分词类依据三条标准:句法功能、司法形态和抽象意义。一般在分析“非谓形容词”(以下简称“非谓”)时,也运用了这三条标准,我们也就先以这三条标准为 Mr. Zhao Yuanren once pointed out: “Only adjectives can be modified, can not be predicate adjectives, strictly speaking, no.” This view represents a general understanding of adjectives in the early days of the Chinese grammar community. In recent years, “non-predicate adjectives,” said, caused a grammar scholars to re-recognize the adjectives. Almost all categories of grammatical discussions involving adjectives now accept the category of “non-adjectives.” However, through some observations and analysis, the author finds that there are still many doubts as to the proposition and evidence collection of the category of “non-predicate adjectives.” Therefore, there is a lot of doubtful points in this field. Therefore, I have put forward some superficial opinions to teach predecessors and colleagues in the field of grammar . 1. According to the generally accepted viewpoints in the study of Chinese grammar, the classification of parts of speech is based on three criteria: syntactic function, judicial form and abstract meaning. The general analysis of “non-predicate adjectives” (hereinafter referred to as “non-predicate”), but also the use of these three criteria, we will first three criteria for these