几乎所有的教科书或文章,都一致谴责马氏的“两个公理说”“抹杀了人与动物的本质区别,是反动反科学的谬论”,并断言“没有制约和贯通全高等有机物的生育规律”,等等.“两个公理说”是马氏人口论的前提和出发点,所以有必要重新对它作一番认真的辨析,看看马尔萨斯的“两个公理说”到底有没有可取的合理因素?有没有可供借鉴的参考价值?马尔萨斯的整个学说,是从“两个公理”开始的。他说: Almost all textbooks or articles unanimously condemned Markov's “two axioms” and “eradicated the essential difference between man and animal. They are the fallacies of reactionary and anti-science.” He asserted that “there is no restriction on and the law of reproduction through organic matter such as full height ”, Etc.“ The two axioms ”are the preconditions and starting points of Markov population theory, so it is necessary to re-analyze it carefully and see if Malthus's“ two axioms ”are reasonable or not Factors? There is no reference value for reference? Malthus's doctrine, from the “two axioms” began. He said: