“管理主义”倡导用市场力量和私营部门的经验来改造政府 ,在公共管理领域实现“去官僚化”、“市场化”和“社会化”。但社会、历史、文化背景的截然不同 ,使中国的公共管理改革与西方管理主义的革新有不同的重心、路径和努力方向。我国公共管理改革模式应选择 :不断完善市场机制及保障公平竞争的法制体系 ,为政府管理中某些领域的市场化运作提供法制环境 ;革新“全能主义”的政府观念和公众对政府的依赖心态 ,卸下政府沉重的行政包袱 ;加快对非政府公共部门、社会团体及私营部门的孵化及培育 ,使之能与庞大的公共部门竞争 ,并承接政府大规模卸载下来的公共事务。 “Managementism” advocates transforming the government with market forces and private-sector experience to achieve “de-bureaucratization”, “marketization” and “socialization” in the field of public administration. However, the very different social, historical and cultural backgrounds make China’s public administration reform and western management reform have different focuses, paths and efforts. The mode of public administration reform in our country should be chosen: the legal system of continuously improving the market mechanism and guaranteeing fair competition, providing a legal environment for market-oriented operation in some areas of government administration; innovating the concept of “all-round” government and public reliance on government , Unloading the heavy administrative burden on the government, accelerating the incubation and nurturing of the non-government public sector, social organizations and the private sector so that they could compete with the huge public sector and undertake public affairs unloaded by the government on a large scale.