论文部分内容阅读
从一元的行为无价值论到二元的行为无价值论,客观处罚条件都是独立于犯罪构成要件的存在。现在,从结果无价值论立场上,将客观处罚条件还原为构成要件已成为大陆法系国家的主流。由于我国现行的犯罪构成理论的特性导致客观处罚条件没有存在的余地。按照“超过的客观要素”理论来理解所谓类似的客观处罚条件违反了责任原则,也没有正确理解犯罪的过错。
From unary act valuelessness to dualistic valuelessness and objective punishment conditions are independent of the existence of elements of crime. Now, from the point of view of no-value results, it has become the mainstream of the civil law countries that the objective punishment conditions are reduced to the elements of constitution. Due to the characteristics of our current criminal constitution theory, there is no room for objective punishment conditions. To understand the so-called similar objective penalty conditions in violation of the principle of responsibility in accordance with the theory of “objective factors over” does not correctly understand the fault of crime.