论文部分内容阅读
关于“赝科学”的命题不属科学范畴,而属哲学范畴。科学研究的基本方法只能针对具体课题通过科学实践来鉴别是非真伪,而不是提出抽象口号用以界定哪一类课题属于“伪科学”和“赝科学”。对科学探索和课题人为设置禁区,与科学精神毫不相容。任何科学界权威都无权充当真理的裁判员,以自己的好恶和有限的已知对无限的未知领域设置禁区。“赝科学”这一抽象概念只能是哲学命题。任何哲学上的是与非都具有三重性。第一,任何对立概念都具有相对性和可变性,它们都依据一定条件相互转化。任何对立概念都将在局限性被认识时,是转化为非。科学成就如被当成绝对真理,必将转化为迷信。
The proposition about “pseudoscience” is not a category of science but a philosophical category. The basic method of scientific research can only identify non-authenticity through scientific practice for specific topics rather than abstract slogans to define which types of topics belong to “pseudoscience” and “pseudoscience”. For scientific exploration and subject man-made forbidden zone, and the spirit of science is incompatible. No authority in the scientific community has the right to act as a referee of the truth, setting a forbidden zone with its own likes and dislikes and a limited set of known and unknown fields. The abstract concept of pseudoscience can only be a philosophical proposition. Any philosophical right and wrong are triple. First, any concept of opposition has relativity and variability, all of which are based on certain conditions. Any concept of opposition will be transformed into false when the limitations are recognized. Scientific achievements, if regarded as absolute truths, will surely turn superstitious.