论文部分内容阅读
1月16日,南京大学中国社会科学研究评价中心最新公示《中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊及集刊(2017—2018)目录》,在学界引起很大反响。武汉大学学报(人文科学版)、同济大学学报(社会科学版)等先后发声,对从“C刊”降为“C扩”表示强烈不满。一时间,有关核心期刊问题的讨论再次成为社会关注的焦点。核心期刊的概念自从20世纪70年代被介绍到中国,至今已近40年。最初,核心期刊目录主要是为图书馆采购外文期刊提供参考,上世纪90年代以来,一些高校将SCI引入考核体系,在SCI发表论文给予奖励,之后,
On January 16, the latest publication of the CSSCI Source Journals and Journals (2017-2018) Catalog of the China Social Science Research Evaluation Center at Nanjing University has aroused great repercussions in academia. Journal of Wuhan University (Humanities Edition), Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Edition) and so on have successively voiced strong dissatisfaction with the reduction from “C Magazine” to “C Expansion”. For a time, the discussion on the core journals once again became the focus of society. The concept of core journals has been introduced to China for about 40 years since it was introduced in the 1970s. Initially, the catalog of core journals mainly provided references for libraries to purchase foreign periodicals. Since the 1990s, some colleges and universities have introduced SCI into the examination system and rewarded papers published in SCI. Later,