论文部分内容阅读
截至2009年12月,中华医学会系列杂志已发展至123种。为了对如此庞大的期刊群进行全面、系统的管理,从而保持较高的出版质量,中华医学会杂志社参考国内外其他期刊评价体系,建设了以期刊综合评价、自检、分级错误处罚等为主要内容的质量控制体系。文章总结了该体系的应用经验,认为在建立期刊综合评价体系的基础上,应针对不同专业期刊的特点,给予更全面、更合理的评价,才能营造出有利于科技期刊发展的良性环境。
As of December 2009, the Chinese Medical Association series of magazines has grown to 123 species. In order to carry out a comprehensive and systematic management of such a large periodical group in order to maintain a high publishing quality, the Chinese Medical Association magazine refers to other periodical evaluation systems at home and abroad and constructs a comprehensive evaluation system based on comprehensive evaluation of journals, self-examination and graded error punishment The main content of the quality control system. The paper summarizes the application experience of this system and believes that based on the establishment of the comprehensive evaluation system of journals, a more comprehensive and reasonable evaluation should be given for the characteristics of different journals in order to create a benign environment conducive to the development of sci-tech periodicals.