论文部分内容阅读
论文从合作偏好、主题偏好、引用偏好三个方面构建了以作者为对象的学术偏好的分析框架。分析框架中的分析单元分别为:国家/机构、关键词、参考文献,对应的分析方法分别为:合作网络分析、共词分析、引用认同。在实证研究中,论文从三个刊载优秀文献计量论文的SSCI期刊上,选取了40位国内外成果较多的文献计量学者为研究对象,比较了他们的学术偏好。实证研究结果表明:1在合作偏好方面,中国大陆文献计量学者发表SSCI论文主要依赖国内合作,其次才是国际合作,最主要的国际合作对象在比利时、匈牙利、荷兰等欧洲国家;2在主题偏好方面,中国大陆学者的研究主题集中在以影响力评价与引文网络结构,虽然发表了大量中文网络计量学论文,但国际论文极少;3在引用偏好方面,国内外学者均偏好引用国际知名学者,文献计量研究的主流仍然在欧美国家。
The dissertation constructs an analysis framework of academic preference based on the author from three aspects: cooperation preference, theme preference and reference preference. The analytical units in the analytical framework are: Country / Agency, Keywords, References, Corresponding Analytical Methods are: Collaborative Network Analysis, Co-word Analysis, Citation Identity. In the empirical research, the essay selects 40 bibliometrics scholars with more achievements at home and abroad as the research object and compares their academic preference from three SSCI journals with excellent bibliometrics. The empirical results show that: 1 In the aspect of cooperation preferences, Chinese scholars of the metropolitan area publish SSCI dissertations mainly on the basis of domestic cooperation, followed by international cooperation, and the most important international cooperation targets are in European countries such as Belgium, Hungary and the Netherlands; In terms of research topics, scholars in mainland China mainly focus on influential evaluation and citation network structures. Although a large number of Chinese e-metrology papers are published, there are few international papers. 3 In terms of reference preferences, both domestic and foreign scholars prefer to refer to internationally renowned scholars , The mainstream of bibliometric research is still in Europe and the United States.