论文部分内容阅读
面对空前繁荣的史学创作—著作与论文数量远远超过了中国史学史上任何一个辉煌的时代,史学界本身却一再惶恐地发出呼救信号,这足使局外人怀疑中国文人是否复发了“处富有而言穷愁”的老毛病。然而,对这一学科的同行来说,无论怎样危言耸听都不算过分。新兴学科不断将历史学挤向社会科学的边缘,昔日历史学家手中的“历史规律”已失去了灵光,“抓住机遇”成为从官方到民间的口头禅;几十年依附于政治而过于庞大的历史研究生产力与日益萎缩的文化消费市场之间,形成了鲜明的反差,史学论著的剧增与印数
Faced with unprecedented prosperity in the history of the creation - the number of writings and essays far exceeded any brilliant era in the history of Chinese historiography, historians themselves have repeatedly sent out a cry for help, which makes outsiders doubt whether the Chinese literati have relapsed Poor words, "the old problems. However, no matter how alarmist it is to the peers in this discipline. Emerging disciplines continue to squeeze history to the edge of the social sciences. The historical law in the hands of historians of the past has lost its vitality. Seizing the opportunity has become a mantra from the official to the private sector. Decades of attachment to politics are too large The historical research productivity and the shrinking cultural consumer market, a sharp contrast, the historiography of the surge and print