论文部分内容阅读
解放以前,在农林植物科学工作者当中,大部分人的研究工作是单在室内进行的。解放以後,大家体会到这种单独依靠室内研究的方法是错误的;因而从事各项与地理环境有关的农林植物科学的工作者,都纷纷组织调查队,着重在野外工作。这是完全正确的,而且也是应该继续提倡的。但是几年以来,有些人因为重视野外调查,就或多或少地疏忽并轻视了室内和长期性的研究工作,个别的人还强调说农林植物学工作本身就是野外工作,认为研究工作就是专指野外调查而言,室内工作不算是“研究”,而只是纯“技术”。这特别代表着部分青年工作同志的想法。这种想法,我认为可能是矫枉过正所发生的偏差。相反地,现
Before the liberation, among the agroforestry workers, most of the research work was done indoors. After the liberation, everyone realized that this method of relying solely on indoor research was wrong. As a result, all those engaged in agro-forestry and plant science related to the geographical environment organized investigation teams to focus on field work. This is entirely correct and should also be advocated. However, in recent years, some people have neglected and neglected indoor and long-term research work more or less because of their emphasis on field investigation. Some people also emphasize that the work of forestry and forestry botany is a field work itself and that research work is specialized Refers to field research, indoor work is not “research”, but only pure “technology.” This particularly represents the thinking of some of our youth work comrades. This idea, I think, may be the deviation of overkill. On the contrary, now