论文部分内容阅读
相比于国资运作平台来说,国资以“一股”掌全局,是一种代价更低、效果更长久的方式目前混合所有制改革如火如荼,国有资本正张开双手迎接社会民间资本。然而,民资对于在股权改革之后的公司治理结构中能取得多大话语权,尤其是在公共服务类企业能否分得改革的一杯羹尚有疑虑,而国资国企系统也有人担忧会在涉及国计民生的领域出现较大风险。于是,国企“金股制”的创新方式再次被提上了改革议程。
Compared with the state-owned assets operation platform, state-owned assets dominate the global market is a more cost-effective and long-lasting effect. At present, the reform of mixed ownership system is in full swing. State-owned capital is opening up its hands to meet the social private capital. However, private capital still has doubts about how much voice can be gained in the corporate governance structure after the shareholding reform, especially whether the public service enterprises can get the share of the reform. However, there are also some concerns about the state-owned assets and SOE system in state- There is a greater risk in the field. As a result, the innovative mode of state-owned enterprises and “gold stocks system” was again put on the reform agenda.