心源性休克经皮治疗后的预后指征

来源 :世界核心医学期刊文摘(心脏病学分册) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:forsanwang
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
Objectives: To determine predictors of outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of 113 patients undergoing emergency coronary angiography and attempted PCI for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in a regional cardiothoracic unit. Results: In-hospital mortality was 51%(58 patients). Adverse outcome was associated with previous myocardial infarction, age over 70 years, cardiogenic shock complicating failure to respond to thrombolytic treatment(failed thrombolysis), and multivessel coronary artery disease. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the first three factors were independent predictors of in-hospital death with odds ratios of 5.21(95%confidence interval(CI) 1.85 to 14.69), 4.02(95%CI 1.14 to 14.12), and 3.78(95%CI 1.43 to 9.96), respectively. Conclusion: About 50%of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing a strategy of urgent coronary angiography and PCI survive to hospital discharge. Survivors do well in the subsequent six months. Emergency PCI for cardiogenic shock reduces mortality from an expected 80%to about 50%. Clinical features can help determine which patients are most likely to gain from urgent coronary angiography and attempted PCI. Alternative strategies are needed to improve the outcome of patients who fare badly. Objectives: To determine predictors of outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of 113 patients undergoing emergency coronary angiography and attempted PCI for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in a Results: In-hospital mortality was 51% (58 patients). Adverse outcome was associated with previous myocardial infarction, age over 70 years, cardiogenic shock complicating failure to respond to thrombolytic treatment (failed thrombolysis), and multivessel coronary artery disease. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the first three factors were independent predictors of in-hospital death with odds ratios of 5.21 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.85 to 14.69), 4.02 (95% CI 1.14 to 14.12), and 3.78 (95% CI 1.43 to 9.96), respectively. Conclusion: About 50% of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing a strategy of urgent coronary angiography and PCI survive to hospital discharge. Survivors do well in the consecutive six months. Emergency PCI for cardiogenic shock reduces mortality from an expected 80% to about 50%. Clinical features can help determine which patients are most likely to gain from urgent coronary angiography and attempted PCI. Alternative strategies are needed to improve the outcome of patients who fare badly.
其他文献
例1男性,72岁.因反复胸骨后痛1个月2002年7月13日入院.胸痛发作时伴胸前压迫感、出汗,持续1~10 min,含服硝酸甘油能缓解.心电图示:V3~V6段压低0.1~0.2 mV,T波低平.高血压病史3年,常服硝苯地平、卡托普利等药物.查体:血压160/90 mm Hg,两肺呼吸音清晰,心界不扩大,心率90次/min,律齐,未闻杂音.腹软,肝脾肋下未扪及,双下肢无水肿.辅助检查:超声心动图示左
加入世贸组织将有利于中国经济的发展,在经济上将逐步缩小与发达国家的差距。经济的发展,既为发展职业教育提供了经济基础,又扩大了对高素质劳动者和专门人才的需求,这将大
利用CATIA软件建立了斜齿限滑差速器的三维实体模型,并将实体模型导入ADAMS/View中创建了虚拟样机模型。在虚拟环境中,对斜齿限滑差速器进行了良好路面和双附着系数路面直线
以具有降血糖活性的达格列净、卡格列净和脱氧野尻霉素为参照,设计合成了新化合物N-[3-(4-乙氧基苄基)-4-氯苯基]-1-脱氧野尻霉素(A)。以2-氯-5-硝基苯甲酸为原料,先将羧酸转
进入中学阶段,随着学习任务的越来越重,每个学生都必须全力应对,才能在各学科的学习中取得好成绩。英语学习是每个中学生必须面对的问题。那么,如何才能在英语学习中打好基础
Context: Atheromatous and thrombotic embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in acute myocardial infarction is common and may result in micr
本文对人文资源和人本管理在图书管理中的作用分别进行了阐述,分析出两者在图书管理中的重要作用,从而促进图书馆事业的长足发展。 This paper elaborates the roles of hum
摘 要:阅读理解在高考中具有举足轻重的地位,从某种程度上讲,阅读理解能力的高低直接影响总分,而在实际教学中,大部分学生的阅读理解能力差。如何培养学生英语阅读能力,就成了一个刻不容缓的问题。  关键词:英语;阅读理解;培养   中图分类号:G420 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1992-7711(2012)05-047-1     一、从培养兴趣开始  教育心理学告诉我们
在广大读者、作者和专家教授们的大力支持下,《实用妇产科杂志》影响力进一步扩大,质量不断提高。除国内医生个人订阅外,单位和机构订户不断增加。根据清华大学中国知识资源
A recent survey shows that people who get highersalaries generally work longer hours than those who getlower salaries.Some people favor higher-paying jobs,even