Co-Mo/γ-Al2O3-TiO2 hydrodesulfurization(HDS)catalyst samples prepared by a urea matrix combustion (UMxC)method,were evaluated in a stainless tubular fixed-bed reactor,with thiophene,benzothiophene and dibenzothiophene in xylene as model feedstocks.The samples were pre-sulfurized using a cyclohexane solution of 3%CS2 and then tested for the HDS reaction.The test results were compared with catalysts prepared by conventional methods involving sequential impregnation(SI)and co-impregnation(CI).The catalysts were characterized using X-ray diffraction(XRD),laser Raman spectroscopy(LRS),high resolution transmission electron microscopy(HRTEM)and N2 physisorption,showing that the UMxC catalyst had higher pore volume and surface area than those prepared by the CI and SI methods.The UMxC method increased metal loading and avoided formation of inert phase,e.g.,β-CoMoO4,for the HDS reaction,suggesting that UMxC method is superior to the conventional impregnation techniques.TiO2 promoter made particles on the catalyst surface closer and alleviated the interaction between molybdenum oxide and the support,and facilitated the formation of well-dispersed Co-and Mo-oxo species on catalyst surface,thus resulting in higher HDS catalytic activity than pure γ-Al2O3 support without modifiers.Consequently,the addition of TiO2 obviously improved the HDS conversion of dibenzothiophene. Co-Mo / γ-Al2O3-TiO2 hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalyst samples prepared by a urea matrix combustion (UMxC) method, were evaluated in a stainless tubular fixed- bed reactor, with thiophene, benzothiophene and dibenzothiophene in xylene as model feedstocks.TheThe samples were pre-sulfurized using a cyclohexane solution of 3% CS2 and then tested for the HDS reaction. The test results were compared with catalysts prepared by conventional methods involving sequential impregnation (SI) and co-impregnation (CI). using X-ray diffraction (XRD), laser Raman spectroscopy (LRS), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and N2 physisorption, showing that the UMxC catalyst had higher pore volume and surface area than those prepared by the CI and SI methods. The UMxC method increased metal loading and avoided formation of inert phase, eg, β-CoMoO4, for the HDS reaction, suggesting that UMxC method is superior to the conventional impregnation techniques. Ti02 promoter made part icles on the catalyst surface closer and alleviated the interaction between molybdenum oxide and the support, and facilitated the formation of well-dispersed Co-and Mo-oxo species on catalyst surface, thus resulting in higher HDS catalytic activity than pure γ-Al2O3 support without modifiers.Consequently, the addition of TiO2 obviously improved the HDS conversion of dibenzothiophene.