论文部分内容阅读
顾颉刚先生是我国现代著名历史学家和社会活动家,以古史、民俗和史地研究卓立于学林,是“古史辨派”的创始人。出于对书画的癖好和沈兼士先生的推荐,顾颉刚先生于1924年底被聘为清室善后委员会顾问,参与了故宫博物院的创建及书画整理工作。但随着人事关系的变化及学术研究方法和重心的逐步确立,顾颉刚先生很快淡出故宫博物院的实际工作,只担任理事、专门委员等名誉职务。在学术研究上,他热衷于古史辨伪,强调“载记”的重要性,其治学理念与北京大学积极于故宫博物院事务的学者,如马衡、陈垣、沈兼士、李宗侗等先生存在较大差异。通过比较从中亦可窥见,20世纪二三十年代北京大学的不同学风和治学方法。
Mr. Gu Jiegang is a famous modern historian and social activist in China. He studied in ancient times with the study of ancient history, folk customs and history and is the founder of “Ancient History Discrimination School.” Out of his hobby of painting and calligraphy and Mr. Shen’s advice, Mr. Gu Jiegang was hired as a counselor for the Qingchi Rehabilitation Committee at the end of 1924 and participated in the creation of the National Palace Museum and the finishing of calligraphy and painting. However, with the change of personnel relations and the gradual establishment of academic research methods and centers of gravity, Mr. Gu Jiegang quickly faded out of the actual work of the National Palace Museum and served only as an honorary position such as director and special committee. In academic research, he is keen on distinguishing ancient books from history and emphasizing the importance of “bearing in mind”. His scholarship and Peking University’s active scholars at the National Palace Museum such as Ma Heng, Chen Yuan, Shen Shenshi and Li Zong Dong and other big differences exist. By comparison, we can also get a glimpse of the different style of study and methodologies of Peking University during the 1920s and 1930s.